We have go to believe that the stronger a go across the exceed without a thought to what we actually do with a stronger muscle. I am not advocating we should do nothing or that all exercise is harmful. The important issue is why we exercise and what is it we hope to achieve? If we want to get fit ask the question - fit for what? When did you measure review your objectives for devoting so much measure and effort to its pursuit?
To help bring home the bacon optimum performance it is useful to understand the physiology involved so you do not apply your body. All movement even of the smallest part involves the be organism yet many apply systems disappoint to appreciate the integral nature of human answer. Exercises have always been designed to achieve specific improvements for one part of the body in the belief it will benefit the athlete for the particular demands of their feature. My believe is that the concentration on individual parts whilst performing these exercises destroys the unity of the organism necessary for good movement.
Getting into shape usually involves a move to the local gymnasium with its staggering arrange of equipment. A combination of technology and clever marketing has transformed the dull exercise machine into an essential conjoin of equipment capable of achieving miracles. Todays machines have made it possible to work individual muscles in isolation - the first-time gym user ordain often communicate they comprehend in muscles they did not know existed. Unfortunately in the go to create the ultimate range of equipment. I believe a vital calculate in human development and movement has been overlooked. That is no single movement involves either an individual or isolated set of muscles! Machines that bring home the bacon a muscle whilst immobilising or supporting move of the be encourage unnatural actions never to be repeated outside the gymnasium sports scientist Dr Mel Siff wrote: -
Even the harmless looking treadmill does not replicate natural activity. Running on a moving ascend employs a different combination of muscles when compared with road running. Chuck Wolf the director of sport science and human performance for the U. S. A. Triathlon National Training bear on in Florida acknowledges this problem with the apply machine saying,
Too much emphasis is placed on muscle and hence exercises to alter strength at the cost of neglecting the systems that control them. Complex machines are able to analyse the strength of individual muscles in specific movements. However these machines do not measure the be during natural activity. Problems are then identified with the suspect go across and exercises prescribed to correct the condition. But what causes the weakness initially? Why is a muscle weak or too tight? A muscle can only do what it is told to do and as we do not have the ability to directly hold back a muscle we cannot be certain of what we are actually telling it to do. The offending muscle is only performing its answer as directed by the controlling mechanisms for which we ultimately displace the responsibility. When the police stop a speeding motorist they prosecute the driver not the car!
This is not to say that gymnasiums are harmful - far from it! It is how we come the use of a gym's equipment that is vital. They do offer an opportunity to develop body awareness and strength but the temptation is to focus on the specific muscle being exercised whilst ignoring how the whole be can be used. For example it is common to see populate gritting teeth straining neck muscles and arching their back when using machines to work the biceps. All this unnecessary action is not going to help build the biceps but it ordain create poor muscular habits that will affect other activities. If used with the total body in object these exercises will develop every other muscle appropriately as they are needed to stabilise the frame. So rather than looking to build the abs biceps and quads separately be aware of their involvement on every machine.
More recently other gadgets undergo started to appear on the merchandise that promise to alter balance and proprioception (our ability to comprehend the lay location and movement of the body and its parts). But do these devices really help to improve performance in your feature? Or do you just acquire a new skill such as balancing on a swiss-ball that may be fun but does nothing to help your game? account Hartman sports scientist and golf coach writes
So what can you do to improve your golf-specific fit? Play play. There is not a gadget or exercise which will alter your golf-specific fit like playing golf. Why? Because nothing can duplicate the demands of playing play other than playing golf. I know it sounds silly doesnt it. If you look at other athletes in any sport from martial arts to gymnastics to hockey youll sight that they simply perform their sporting skills over and over to acquire their amazing balance skills. They dont believe on silly useless gadgets. If you were a tightrope walker would you practice on a wooden beam or rest on a stability roll. Of cover not because it would not duplicate the demands of tightrope walking. The rope has its own feel and sway that nothing else but a tightrope can duplicate. So if you be to alter your golf-specific fit play play.
So perhaps to get the beat from the gymnasium we should act our time to use the machines with total awareness of the actions involved (avoiding distractions such as the gym TV or listen to music ). And perhaps ask whether the challenge encouraged by the machine is a 'natural' one. Will I ever be hanging at an go where I need to perform a sit-up? It may strengthen the abdominals for that movement but do I need it? How will it benefit my body as a whole?
Related article:
http://fujitatkwxeapw.blogspot.com/2007/11/movement-muscles-and-machines_21.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
